The title does not lie, relationships are a funny thing, sometimes they’re the laughing funny and others they’re just plain ‘I don’t know what the heck I’m doing’ funny. As for most, they categorize themselves in the ‘dont know what I’m doing funny’, but I’d like to be in the laughing funny.
It’s like, I seem fine with being alone, I actually find a lot of peace in solitude amidst green flowers(the color deboed by hungry deer, yes I’m mad at the deer for eating my sunflowers), virgin countryside, and perfectly clear nights(unhendered by dreary fog or boistrous lights) yet I oddly look forward to, all day, spending time with friends in the evenings. Close friends are a necessity, but what are the steps of those close relationships to be taken as to becomming closer? When it comes to close relationships, as well as things that I do that aren’t socially acceptable, I pretend I’m in a non-existant world where no one gets mad, and everyone forgets about the quarrels at hand. I am willing to supress/forget feelings and hurt in order to avoid ‘working things out’.
To work things out is to be with offence in ones heart, so much so that it is impossible to move on in longsuffering and forgiveness. Or, could it be to work things out is to be wise in that learning from your past will prevent other mistakes. But what is a mistake and why do they occur? Well, for one, someone doesn’t like the way something went down, ie you told something that was supposed to be held secret, and they need some sort of earthly/human consolation proving…who knows what. Is it really possible, in our human nature, to fix or bring correction to a certain situation that went awry? It is quite possible, withthe all determining factor of including God, yet that brings me to the question of is it really necessary to include ourselves? Is it really that bad of an idea just to enjoy eachother and when strife comes to just say ‘whatever’ and move on? Or is it out of our pride that we assume we deserve some sort of right of ownership of a certain feeling we want to hang on to, or assume, everytime a particular event occurs? For example, everytime Person A bites their nails it aggravates person B. Person B tells them not to do it around them. So person A stops. What gives Person B the right to choose the course of actions for person A? This act was obviously out of selfishness. Of course there is the disclaimer of Person A being a christian and person B not, so they exemplify longsuffering in regards to sacrificing their nail biting, but come on. If we were to assume the position of I have no right to any type of mannerism or reaction to other people, we would be able to accomplish the beautiful task of ‘going with the flow’ and never needing ‘serious talks’ of working things out.
The world is already too serious, why bring that quality into our personal lives?
I may be totally off, but think about this utopian ideal for a minute. If we all were to assume ultimate selflessness, there wolud be no need for working things out. In the case of someone becomming infected with the selfish bug, they would need to be excommunicated from the village. joke…but really, why do we fight, why do we have issues with one another? Aside from the fact that we are different and we need to develop understanding of one another, but is it possible to find that understanding with out quarrels and serious talks? Maybe I’m just a blinded advocate for a neverneverland society, where no one grows up and we just fly around all day.
“Let’s pretend we don’t exist, let’s pretend we’re from antarctica”
Recent Comments